Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a review and comparative study of recent multi-view 2D and 3D approaches for human action recognition. The approaches are reviewed and categorized due to their nature. We report a comparison of the most promising methods using two publicly available datasets: the INRIA Xmas Motion Acquisition Sequences (IXMAS) and the i3DPost Multi-View Human Action and Interaction Dataset. Additionally, we discuss some of the shortcomings of multi-view camera setups and outline our thoughts on future directions of 3D human action recognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holte et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: