In this paper we examine the relationship between small sets and their generalisation, pseudo-small sets. We consider conditions which imply the equivalence of the two notions, and give examples where they are definitely different. We give further examples where sets are both pseudo-small and small, but the minorisation constants implied by the two notions are different. Applications of recent computable bounds results are given and extended. We also give a result linking the ideas of monotonicity and minorisation. Specifically we demonstrate that if a non-monotone chain satisfies a minorisation condition, and furthermore is stochastically dominated by a monotone chain which satisfies a Lyapunov drift condition, then a probability construction exists which incorporates both the bounding process and the minorisation condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: