Key result
Male sex is associated with ~35% higher odds of achieving SBP targets versus females in secondary prevention.
Why the study?
Sex-related differences in cardiovascular diagnosis, treatment, and risk factor management have been reported, prompting exploration of sex-based cardiovascular outcome differences in the Heartwatch secondary prevention programme.
Are there sex-based differences in cardiovascular risk factor management and target achievement among patients attending a secondary cardiovascular prevention programme?
Observational (n=8,893)
Yes
Are there sex-based differences in cardiovascular risk factor management and target achievement among patients attending a secondary cardiovascular prevention programme?
Odds Ratio: 1.35 (95% CI 1.21–1.49)
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 55%
In a national secondary cardiovascular prevention program, female patients consistently exhibited worse cardiovascular risk factor profiles and lower target achievement compared to male patients over 4 years of follow-up.
May warrant sex-specific BP monitoring in secondary prevention; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
In the last two decades, sex-related differences regarding cardiovascular diagnosis, treatment, and risk factors management have been reported. The current study aims to explore differences in cardiovascular outcomes among male and female patients attending the Irish secondary cardiovascular prevention programme - Heartwatch. This is a retrospective observational study. Anonymous data was extracted from the Heartwatch database from 2003 to 2017. Cardiovascular risk factors were analysed at sign-up and at four years follow-ups. An 8-point aggregate risk score (CCare Score) was assessed to calculate targeted outcomes. Generalized estimating equations models were applied for data analysis. In total 8893 patients (77 % male) were included. Females exhibited a higher risk profile across all cardiovascular risk factors and were more likely to be off target than males at baseline and after 4 years of programme attendance [M to F odds ratios(95 % CI); systolic blood pressure: 1.35 (1.21–1.49), waist circumference: 2.11(1.89–2.36), physical activity: 1.72 (1.53–1.95)]. CCare scores also demonstrated the gap between male and female patients at baseline [mean(sd); M: 5.1(1.2), F: 4.8(1.2)] and after 4 years of structured care [mean(sd); M: 5.3(1.2), F: 4.9(1.2)]. Female patients were less likely to be prescribed aspirin and ACE inhibitors but more likely to be prescribed AT2 inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics compared to male patients. The Heartwatch programme has demonstrably improved patient care, however, the continuous underperformance of female patients necessitates further investigation to ensure appropriate and equitable secondary CVD prevention among the Irish population. • Sex-based differences in CVD risk outcomes were identified in secondary CVD prevention programme. • Females had worse CVD risk factors at baseline, and after 4 years of care. • Females are less likely to receive aspirin/ACE inhibitors, but more likely to get AT2 inhibitors/diuretics than males. • Further research needed to understand underlying causes and ensure optimal care for both sexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keenan et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=8,893). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Achievement of systolic blood pressure target at 4 years (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.21-1.49). Male patients attending a secondary cardiovascular prevention programme had significantly higher odds of achieving systolic blood pressure targets (OR 1.35) compared to female patients after 4 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: