Why the study?
ECGs are often taught without clinical context, even though they are rarely interpreted without knowledge of the clinical presentation in clinical practice.
Does providing clinical case vignettes improve the accuracy of ECG interpretation among medical students and residents compared to interpretation without clinical context?
Cross-Sectional (n=176)
No
Does providing clinical case vignettes improve the accuracy of ECG interpretation among medical students and residents compared to interpretation without clinical context?
Odds Ratio: 1.58 (95% CI 1.35–1.84)
Providing clinical context via case vignettes marginally improves ECG diagnostic accuracy among medical trainees, but prior real-life clinical exposure to the specific ECG abnormalities has a substantially greater impact on diagnostic success.
Background ECGs are often taught without clinical context. However, in the clinical setting, ECGs are rarely interpreted without knowing the clinical presentation. Methods We aimed to determine whether ECG diagnostic accuracy was influenced by knowledge of the clinical context and/or prior clinical exposure to the ECG diagnosis. Fourth- (junior) and sixth-year (senior) medical students as well as medical residents were invited to complete two multiple-choice question (MCQ) tests and a survey on the same day. Test 1 comprised 25 ECGs without case vignettes. Test 2, completed immediately after Test 1, comprised the same 25 ECGs and MCQs, but with case vignettes for each ECG. Subsequently, participants indicated in the survey when last, during prior clinical clerkships, they have seen each of the 25 conditions tested in Test 1 and 2. Results This study comprised 176 participants, of which 67 (38.1%) were junior students, 55 (31.3%) were senior students and 54 (30.7%) were medical residents. Prior ECG exposure depended on their level of training, i.e., junior students were exposed to 52% of the conditions tested, senior students 63.4% and residents 96.9%. Overall, all groups showed a marginal improvement in accuracy of ECG interpretation when the clinical context was known to them (Cohen’s d = 0.35, p < 0.001). The gains in accuracy were more pronounced amongst residents (Cohen’s d = 0.59, p < 0.001), than amongst senior (Cohen’s d = 0.38, p < 0.001) or junior students (Cohen’s d = 0.29, p < 0.001). All participants were more likely to make a correct ECG diagnosis if they reported having seen the condition during prior clinical training, whether they were provided with a case vignette (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–1.71) or not (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.35–1.84). Conclusion ECG interpretation using clinical vignettes devoid of real patient experiences does not appear to have as great an impact on ECG diagnostic accuracy as prior exposure during clinical training. However, exposure to ECGs during clinical training is largely opportunistic and haphazard. ECG training should therefore not rely on experiential learning alone for teaching electrocardiography, but instead be supplemented by other formal methods of instruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viljoen et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in ECG interpretation (n=176). Prior clinical exposure to ECG conditions vs. No prior clinical exposure was evaluated on Correct ECG diagnosis (without case vignette) (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.35-1.84).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: