OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that unloading the left ventricle with intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation just prior to reperfusion provides infarct salvage compared with left ventricular (LV) unloading postreperfusion or reperfusion alone. BACKGROUND: Previous reports demonstrated infarct salvage with complete LV unloading with an LVAD prior to reperfusion; however, partial LV unloading using intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) has not been evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-eight Yorkshire pigs were subjected to 1 hr of left anterior descending artery occlusion and 4 hr of reperfusion. An IABP was inserted and activated just prior to reperfusion (IABP-Pre), or 15 min after reperfusion (IABP-Post), or not at all (control). RESULTS: At baseline, the hemodynamic data were similar in the three groups. Myocardial infarct size expressed a percentage of zone at risk in control animals was 44.9% +/- 4.8%, IAPB-Pre group 20.9% +/- 5.1% (P < 0.05 compared to control), and IABP-Post group 33.2 +/- 6.1% (P = 0.16 vs. control group). There was a correlation between transcardiac endothelin-1 release at 15 min postreperfusion and infarct size (r = 0.59). CONCLUSION: LV unloading with an IABP prior to reperfusion reduces the extent of myocardial necrosis in hearts subjected to 1 hr of left anterior descending artery occlusion and 4 hr of reperfusion compared with either reperfusion alone or LV unloading after reperfusion. Inhibition of myocardial ET-1 release by LV unloading may be a significant mechanism of myocardial protection. These data suggest that in high-risk STEMI patients, IABP unloading prior to reperfusion might be more beneficial than IABP placement postreperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LeDoux et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: