Purpose Data, as the key production factor, has become a new engine to drive economic growth. Focusing on the impact of cross-border data flows on economic development, national security and data sovereignty, this paper aims to focus on analyzing the current legal status of cross-border data flows in China, with the aim of exploring the key paths for China to seek a balance between security and development and to optimize the regulatory framework for cross-border data governance. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes China’s cross-border data flow governance by reviewing primary sources, including national laws and official documents and secondary sources such as academic literature. It combines doctrinal, descriptive, socio-legal and comparative approaches to examine legal frameworks, policy drivers and international implications. Findings The research findings reveal a significant shift in China’s governance model, from a restrictive, security-centered approach toward a “data developmentalism” paradigm that seeks to balance national security with economic growth. This transition is driven by multiple factors, including a priority on economic growth, a continuous pursuit of technological innovation, and the increasing need for data cooperation in the context of the global digital economy. China’s evolving cross-border data flow governance framework not only strengthens its engagement in global digital trade but also provides a model for other countries aiming to reconcile national security with economic development. Originality/value The importance of cross-border data flows in the digital era to the growth of digital economy of all countries is inestimable, this paper systematically combs through the current legal status of cross-border data flows in China and explores the feasible path of balancing the security and development paths by taking the security potential pairs of cross-border data flow, which is of great concern to the state, as an entry point.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: