What counts as evidence? What is accepted as true in court given the evidence admitted? How are subordinated peoples further oppressed in courts because they cannot demonstrate that their experience is fact? Drawing on the confirmation brings for Clarence Thomas as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court and the testimony of Anita Hill in those hearings, the author explores the ways in which representations of sexual violence against women can be seen as not “real.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim Lane Scheppele (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: