PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 11, 2020The Journal of Physiology52 citationsOpen Access

Internal carotid and brachial artery shear‐dependent vasodilator function in young healthy humans

View Full Paper
JCJay M. J. R. CarrRHRyan L. HoilandHCHannah G. Caldwell

Key Result

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the internal carotid artery (3.4%) was significantly lower than and not correlated with that of the brachial artery (7.9%, P=0.013) in young healthy adults.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=19)

Structured PICO

Is endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation similar in magnitude and correlated between the internal carotid artery and brachial artery in young healthy adults?

P
Population
19 healthy adults (mean age 23 years, 32% female) assessed for internal carotid and brachial artery endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation.
E
Exposure
Assessment of internal carotid artery (ICA) endothelium-dependent vasodilation (via CO2-induced shear stress) and endothelium-independent vasodilation (via 400 µg sublingual glyceryl trinitrate)
C
Comparator
Assessment of brachial artery (BA) endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation
O
Outcome
Magnitude and correlation of endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation between the internal carotid artery and brachial arterysurrogate

Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilator function is not correlated between the internal carotid and brachial arteries in young healthy humans, indicating that peripheral vascular function should not be used as a surrogate for large extracranial cerebral artery health.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 3.4% vs 7.9%

p-value: p=0.013

Abstract

Key points Brachial artery (BA) shear‐mediated dilatation is a widely used assessment of vascular function with links to coronary artery health and cardiovascular risk. Cerebral vascular health is often interrogated using cerebrovascular (middle cerebral artery velocity) reactivity to carbon dioxide. We show that endothelium‐dependent diameter (dilator) responses are not significantly related between the internal carotid artery (ICA) and BA; nor are endothelium‐independent responses. Additionally, ICA endothelium‐dependent responses are not related to middle cerebral artery velocity or ICA blood flow reactivity responses to carbon dioxide. Therefore, assessment of large extracranial cerebral artery vascular health should be quantified via methods specific to the vessel, not via peripheral endothelial function or cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide. Abstract This study compared internal carotid artery (ICA) and brachial artery (BA) endothelium‐dependent and ‐independent vasodilation. We hypothesized that endothelium‐dependent and ‐independent vasodilation of the ICA and BA would be neither similar in magnitude nor correlated between vessels. In 19 healthy adults (23 ± 6 years, 24 ± 3 kg/m 2 , six female), endothelium‐dependent dilatation in the ICA was determined via Duplex ultrasound during transiently elevated shear stress caused by increased partial pressure of end‐tidal carbon dioxide using dynamic end‐tidal forcing (+9 mmHg; cerebral flow‐mediated dilatation, cFMD). BA endothelium‐dependent dilatation was assessed via standard flow‐mediated dilatation (FMD). Endothelium‐independent dilatation in the ICA and BA was assessed concurrently for 10 min following administration of 400 µg sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Endothelium‐dependent vasodilation of the ICA (3.4 ± 2.4%) was lower than ( P = 0.013) and not correlated to that of the BA (7.9 ± 3.3%; r 2 = 0.00, P = 0.93). Including baseline diameter and shear‐rate area under the curve as covariates maintained the difference between cFMD and FMD (3.3 ± 4.2% vs . 7.8 ± 3.8%, P = 0.03), while including baseline diameter and baseline shear rate‐adjusted area under the curve as covariates abolished it (5.9 ± 3.7% vs . 5.9.8 ± 3.5%, P = 0.99). GTN‐mediated vasodilation of the ICA (14.3 ± 2.9%) was lower than ( P = 0.002) and not correlated to that of the BA (25.5 ± 8.8%; r 2 = 0.12, P = 0.19). Adjusting for baseline diameter eliminated the differences in GTN‐induced vasodilation (ICA: 20.1 ± 5.8% vs . BA: 20.4 ± 5.5%; P = 0.93). Differences in endothelium‐dependent responses, and the lack of correlations between arteries, indicates that endothelium‐dependent function cannot be assumed to be related across cerebral and peripheral vasculatures in young, healthy humans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carr et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=19). Internal carotid artery (ICA) assessment vs. Brachial artery (BA) assessment was evaluated on Endothelium-dependent vasodilation (p=0.013). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the internal carotid artery (3.4%) was significantly lower than and not correlated with that of the brachial artery (7.9%, P=0.013) in young healthy adults.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22aa5d519b89fa360df1f4https://doi.org/10.1113/jp280369
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper