PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1995The Journal of General Physiology248 citationsOpen Access

Regulation of the cardiac Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger by Ca2+. Mutational analysis of the Ca(2+)-binding domain.

View Full Paper
SMSatoshi MatsuokaDNDebora A. NicollLHLarry V. Hryshko

Key Result

Single-site mutations within two acidic clusters of the Ca2+ binding domain of the cardiac Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger lowered apparent Ca2+ affinity at the regulatory site from 0.4 to 1.1-1.8 microM.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Xenopus oocytes expressing wild-type and mutant cardiac Na(+)-Ca2+ exchangers
I
Intervention
Single-site mutations within two acidic clusters of the Ca2+ binding domain
C
Comparator
Wild-type Na(+)-Ca2+ exchangers
O
Outcome
Apparent Ca2+ affinity at the regulatory site and stimulation of reverse Na(+)-Ca2+ exchange by intracellular Ca2+surrogate

Mutational analysis identifies the functionally important Ca2+ binding domain on the cardiac Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger and suggests that Ca2+ regulation modifies transport properties rather than just controlling the fraction of active exchangers.

Abstract

The sarcolemmal Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger is regulated by intracellular Ca2+ at a high affinity Ca2+ binding site separate from the Ca2+ transport site. Previous data have suggested that the Ca2+ regulatory site is located on the large intracellular loop of the Na(+)-Ca2+ exchange protein, and we have identified a high-affinity 45Ca2+ binding domain on this loop (Levitsky, D. O., D. A. Nicoll, and K. D. Philipson. 1994. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 269:22847-22852). We now use electrophysiological and mutational analyses to further define the Ca2+ regulatory site. Wild-type and mutant exchangers were expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and the exchange current was measured using the inside-out giant membrane patch technique. Ca2+ regulation was measured as the stimulation of reverse Na(+)-Ca2+ exchange (intracellular Na+ exchanging for extracellular Ca2+) by intracellular Ca2+. Single-site mutations within two acidic clusters of the Ca2+ binding domain lowered the apparent Ca2+ affinity at the regulatory site from 0.4 to 1.1-1.8 microM. Mutations had parallel effects on the affinity of the exchanger loop for 45Ca2+ binding (Levitsky et al., 1994) and for functional Ca2+ regulation. We conclude that we have identified the functionally important Ca2+ binding domain. All mutant exchangers with decreased apparent affinities at the regulatory Ca2+ binding site also have a complex pattern of altered kinetic properties. The outward current of the wild-type Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger declines with a half time (th) of 10.8 +/- 3.2 s upon Ca2+ removal, whereas the exchange currents of several mutants decline with th values of 0.7-4.3 s. Likewise, Ca2+ regulation mutants respond more rapidly to Ca2+ application. Study of Ca2+ regulation has previously been possible only with the exchanger operating in the reverse mode as the regulatory Ca2+ and the transported Ca2+ are then on opposite sides of the membrane. The use of exchange mutants with low affinity for Ca2+ at regulatory sites also allows demonstration of secondary Ca2+ regulation with the exchanger in the forward or Ca2+ efflux mode. In addition, we find that the affinity of wild-type and mutant Na(+)-Ca2+ exchangers for intracellular Na+ decreases at low regulatory Ca2+. This suggests that Ca2+ regulation modifies transport properties and does not only control the fraction of exchangers in an active state.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matsuoka et al. (1995) studied this question. Single-site mutations within acidic clusters of the Ca2+ binding domain vs. Wild-type exchangers was evaluated on Ca2+ affinity at the regulatory site. Single-site mutations within two acidic clusters of the Ca2+ binding domain of the cardiac Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger lowered apparent Ca2+ affinity at the regulatory site from 0.4 to 1.1-1.8 microM.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22b0ff80ebe3feac149ef4https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.105.3.403
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper