Key result
Polio outbreak simulation exercises revealed that national preparedness plans were inadequately aligned with WHO guidelines, leading to plan revisions in all 8 participating countries.
Why the study?
All countries remain at high risk of polio re-importation, making national outbreak preparedness and response plans and conducting simulation exercises important.
Cross-Sectional (n=8)
Yes
Polio outbreak simulation exercises revealed that national preparedness plans in East and Southern Africa were inadequately aligned with WHO guidelines, prompting necessary revisions.
INTRODUCTION: globally, by 2020 the paralytic poliomyelitis disease burden decreased to over 99% of the reported cases in 1988 when resolution 41.8 was endorsed by the World Health Assembly (WHA) for global polio eradication. It is clearly understood that, if there is Wild Poliovirus (WPV) and circulating Vaccines Derived Poliovirus (cVDPV) in the world, no country is safe from polio outbreaks. All countries remain at high risk of re-importation depending on the level of the containment of the types vaccine withdrawn, the laboratory poliovirus isolates, and the population immunity induced by the vaccination program. In this regard, countries to have polio outbreak preparedness and response plans, and conducting the polio outbreak simulation exercises for these plans remain important. METHODS: we conducted a cross-section qualitative study to review to 8 countries conducted polio outbreak simulation exercises in the East and Southern Africa from 2016 to 2018. The findings were categorized into 5 outbreak response thematic areas analyzed qualitatively and summarized them on their strengths and weaknesses. RESULTS: we found out that, most countries have the overall technical capacities and expertise to deal with outbreaks to a certain extent. Nevertheless, we noted that the national polio outbreak preparedness and response plans were not comprehensive enough to provide proper guidance in responding to outbreaks. The guidelines were inadequately aligned with the WHO POSOPs, and IHR 2005. Additionally, most participants who participated in the simulation exercises were less familiar with their preparedness and response plans, the WHO POSOPs, and therefore reported to be sensitized. CONCLUSION: we also realized that, in all countries where the polio simulation exercise conducted, their national polio outbreak preparedness and response plan was revised to be improved in line with the WHO POSOPs and IHR 2005. we, therefore, recommend the polio outbreak simulation exercises to be done in every country with an interval of 3-5 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manyanga et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Polio outbreaks (n=8). Polio outbreak simulation exercises was evaluated on Strengths and weaknesses of outbreak response thematic areas. Polio outbreak simulation exercises revealed that national preparedness plans were inadequately aligned with WHO guidelines, leading to plan revisions in all 8 participating countries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: