Key result
Full-body backscatter x-ray scanners emit extremely small radiation doses, contributing less than 1% of the dose received from cosmic rays during a flight, posing no significant cancer risk.
Why the study?
Do full-body backscatter x-ray scanners increase cancer risk in airline passengers?
Do full-body backscatter x-ray scanners increase cancer risk in airline passengers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Full-body backscatter x-ray scanners at airports deliver negligible radiation doses and pose no significant cancer risk to passengers.
In the past year, the Transportation Security Administration has deployed full-body scanners in airports across the United States in response to heightened security needs. Several groups have opposed the scans, citing privacy concerns and fear of the radiation emitted by the backscatter x-ray scanners, 1 of the 2 types of machines in use. The radiation doses emitted by the scans are extremely small; the scans deliver an amount of radiation equivalent to 3 to 9 minutes of the radiation received through normal daily living. Furthermore, since flying itself increases exposure to ionizing radiation, the scan will contribute less than 1% of the dose a flyer will receive from exposure to cosmic rays at elevated altitudes. The estimation of cancer risks associated with these scans is difficult, but using the only available models, the risk would be extremely small, even among frequent flyers. We conclude that there is no significant threat of radiation from the scans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2011) conducted a review in Radiation exposure. Full-body backscatter x-ray scanners vs. Normal daily living radiation was evaluated on Cancer risk. Full-body backscatter x-ray scanners emit extremely small radiation doses, contributing less than 1% of the dose received from cosmic rays during a flight, posing no significant cancer risk.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: