Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Heterotrimeric G protein signaling specificity has been attributed to select combinations of Gα, β, and γ subunits, their interactions with other signaling proteins, and their localization in the cell. With few exceptions, the G protein subunit combinations that exist in vivo and the significance of these specific combinations are largely unknown. We have begun to approach these problems in HeLa cells by: 1) determining the concentrations of Gα and Gβ subunits; 2) examining receptor-dependent activities of two effector systems (adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase Cβ); and 3) systematically silencing each of the Gα and Gβ subunits by using small interfering RNA while quantifying resultant changes in effector function and the concentrations of other relevant proteins in the network. HeLa cells express equimolar amounts of total Gα and Gβ subunits. The most prevalent Gα proteins were one member of each Gα subfamily (Gαs, Gαi3, Gα11, and Gα13). We substantially abrogated expression of most of the Gα and Gβ proteins expressed in these cells, singly and some in combinations. As expected, agonist-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase or phospholipase Cβ was specifically eliminated following the silencing of Gαs or Gαq/11, respectively. We also confirmed that Gβ subunits are necessary for stable accumulation of Gα proteins in vivo. Gβ subunits demonstrated little isoform specificity for receptor-dependent modulation of effector activity. We observed compensatory changes in G protein accumulation following silencing of individual genes, as well as an apparent reciprocal relationship between the expression of certain Gαq and Gαi subfamily members. These findings provide a foundation for understanding the mechanisms that regulate the adaptability and remarkable resilience of G protein signaling networks. Heterotrimeric G protein signaling specificity has been attributed to select combinations of Gα, β, and γ subunits, their interactions with other signaling proteins, and their localization in the cell. With few exceptions, the G protein subunit combinations that exist in vivo and the significance of these specific combinations are largely unknown. We have begun to approach these problems in HeLa cells by: 1) determining the concentrations of Gα and Gβ subunits; 2) examining receptor-dependent activities of two effector systems (adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase Cβ); and 3) systematically silencing each of the Gα and Gβ subunits by using small interfering RNA while quantifying resultant changes in effector function and the concentrations of other relevant proteins in the network. HeLa cells express equimolar amounts of total Gα and Gβ subunits. The most prevalent Gα proteins were one member of each Gα subfamily (Gαs, Gαi3, Gα11, and Gα13). We substantially abrogated expression of most of the Gα and Gβ proteins expressed in these cells, singly and some in combinations. As expected, agonist-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase or phospholipase Cβ was specifically eliminated following the silencing of Gαs or Gαq/11, respectively. We also confirmed that Gβ subunits are necessary for stable accumulation of Gα proteins in vivo. Gβ subunits demonstrated little isoform specificity for receptor-dependent modulation of effector activity. We observed compensatory changes in G protein accumulation following silencing of individual genes, as well as an apparent reciprocal relationship between the expression of certain Gαq and Gαi subfamily members. These findings provide a foundation for understanding the mechanisms that regulate the adaptability and remarkable resilience of G protein signaling networks. Signal-transducing heterotrimeric G proteins are associated with the inner face of the plasma membrane, positioned as middlemen for activation by membrane-spanning, heptahelical receptors, and regulation of a variety of intracellular effectors. Interactions among these proteins are controlled by agonist-induced changes of receptor conformation and nucleotide-driven conformational changes of the α subunits of the G proteins (Gα). A ligand-bound receptor catalyzes the exchange of GDP for GTP on a cognate Gα, and as a result, the (at least partial) dissociation of Gα from a complex of Gβ and Gγ subunits. These activated subunits are then capable of modulating the functional properties of effector proteins (e.g. adenylyl cyclases and phospholipases). The intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα serves as a molecular timer, returning the protein to the GDP-bound state and allowing reformation of the inactive heterotrimer. Much remains to be learned about the specificity of G protein signaling in vivo, the relative importance of isoforms of G protein subunits with apparently redundant functions, and the qualitative and quantitative significance of the fact that many hundreds of G protein heterotrimers can be assembled from the collection of G protein α, β, and γ subunits that are expressed in single cells. There is evidence for exquisite specificity of signaling through certain pathways. For example, intranuclear injection of anti-sense oligonucleotides against specific G protein subunits revealed that the M4-muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition of L-type Ca2+ channels requires Gαoa,Gβ3, and Gγ4, whereas similar inhibition initiated by somatostatin receptors requires Gαob,Gβ1, and Gγ3 subunits (1Kleuss C. Hescheler J. Ewel C. Rosenthal W. Schultz G. Wittig B. Nature. 1991; 353: 43-48Crossref PubMed Scopus (467) Google Scholar, 2Kleuss C. Scherubl H. Hescheler J. Schultz G. Wittig B. Nature. 1992; 358: 424-426Crossref PubMed Scopus (332) Google Scholar, 3Kleuss C. Scherubl H. Hescheler J. Schultz G. Wittig B. Science. 1993; 259: 832-834Crossref PubMed Scopus (332) Google Scholar). The generality of these and related studies has not been examined, and there has been little effort to monitor and understand the compensatory mechanisms that such perturbations may set in motion. Furthermore, studies performed in vitro do not reveal such demanding specificity, and mechanisms of such phenomena are not known. Herein we describe a more comprehensive attempt to examine these issues. We have sought information about the expression of most G protein subunits in a clonal human cell line (HeLa), and we have examined the functional and compensatory effects of siRNA 2The abbreviations used are: siRNA, small-interfering RNA; RNAi, RNA interference; INE, isoproterenol; PGE1, prostaglandin E1; IP, total inositol-phosphate; AC, adenylyl cyclase; PLCβ, phospholipase C β; RT, reverse transcriptase. 2The abbreviations used are: siRNA, small-interfering RNA; RNAi, RNA interference; INE, isoproterenol; PGE1, prostaglandin E1; IP, total inositol-phosphate; AC, adenylyl cyclase; PLCβ, phospholipase C β; RT, reverse transcriptase.-mediated silencing of the expression of genes encoding members of the Gαs, Gαi, Gαq, and Gβ subfamilies of G protein subunits. Reagents—All reagents were purchased from Sigma unless noted otherwise. Mammalian Cell Culture—HeLa cells (from ATCC) were cultured at 37 °C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with high glucose (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum under an atmosphere of 95% air, 5% CO2. Cells were cultured in the same lot of serum and passaged twice weekly by trypsinization. Fresh cultures were established from the same frozen stock after 10 passages. Transient RNA Interference (RNAi) Transfection—Single-stranded 21-mer oligonucleotides (containing 19 ribonucleotides and 2 3′-deoxythymidine residues) targeting the open reading frames of selected proteins were designed using the Dharmacon siRNA Design Center. Candidate sequences were subjected to further BLAST analysis against the human genome data base (NCBI) and selected for further study if no more than 14 contiguous bases were identical to of human oligonucleotides were as J. W. Nature. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The sequences of the and the in the open reading frames are in Transient of were using (Invitrogen) to HeLa cells were at The cells were using 19 of and a total of of in a of the cells were at and subjected to a after the the cells were and to after the the cells were used for or for and of protein used in the study to or G protein and specificity 1991; PubMed Scopus Google 1993; PubMed Scopus Google and for and J. 1993; PubMed Google J. PubMed Google J. 1991; PubMed Google J. 1993; PubMed Google J. PubMed Google PubMed Scopus Google 1993; PubMed Scopus Google PubMed Scopus Google B. J. PubMed Google for for and with in a accumulation were using cells and with 10 of for in Cells were with and for at °C to the of were by of and 5% monitor was from other by and as PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). accumulation was by HeLa cells for with 10 of in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine Cells were for at 37 °C with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's to the of were by of 10 to The was to a was with of 10 10 and of to with of was by and to the of was as by PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). receptor concentrations were for cells in using 2 in the or of the or the receptor was in were in 10 and and through was by were cultured to of cell and total protein Gα and Gβ bovine and were after expression in as PubMed Scopus Google the Gαi proteins were with protein and were at their cells were with encoding human Gα11, or and encoding and and the G proteins were as G of Scholar). Gαq and were from G. and of bovine and human and proteins were by of concentrations were using an W. C. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). was for proteins as by for were by cells with and in and The were for to from HeLa cells were as J. PubMed Google Scholar). cells were by for and cells were by for The was a and and The plasma were at the and by The were in frozen in and at concentrations for total and were with the protein W. C. PubMed Scopus Google using bovine serum as and for total cell or plasma were in Nature. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). For adenylyl cyclase proteins, plasma were with and at to the of and are in with were with or to were in and with the for The were and were by were and the of the were For quantitative HeLa cell protein were from the of the amounts of Gα or Gβ subunit on the same For relative protein the of in from cells was to the in an of from cells. of was using quantitative were using the relative or and to a expression specific for a Gα or Gβ subunit was with a and of total RNA was from HeLa cells using the and data were following each using the were from set to between were using a or single analysis of G in HeLa proteins were as of the Gα genes by not and in Gαs and and were confirmed by and specificity was by silencing of in of two Gα genes, and were by the proteins were not to of plasma with of of or protein was for We not expression of Gα subunits that are in and and the Gβ genes, we expression of in HeLa and we no evidence for expression of subunits to with proteins of the J. PubMed Scopus Google and there is little evidence for the in vivo of and Gγ subunits, we on and subunits We also examined the expression of Gγ subunits in HeLa cells. analysis of Gγ genes, expression is largely to the 1992; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of the of specific and to most Gγ proteins, we have studies to to Gα and to examining the effects of silencing individual G protein subunits, we the amounts of Gα and Gβ proteins in total from cells revealed that of the Gα subunit protein was for by one member of each of the subfamilies of Gα Gαi3, Gα11, and the of and of and were expressed at similar and for of the total Gβ subunit the There was no between the total of Gβ protein with a Gβ and the of Gβ subunits from data using Gβ of the data in to that the of the Gα subunits 2 that of the Gβ proteins of with the that most or of these subunits exist as of G remarkable than of protein expression for each Gα and Gβ subunit A and after silencing by or in than of Gα subunits was necessary to changes in effector the of G protein to effector in some J. Google Scholar). 2 to were designed and each in most protein expression more than with Gβ with oligonucleotides not the also cell most protein using a with no with the open reading of human that cell may be by mechanisms to specific by We using that effects on cell or of on of proteins activation of adenylyl cyclases by G As of Gαs abrogated in A and by INE, a receptor or PGE1, an receptor A of and silencing of cell receptors 1) demonstrated that of the whereas signaling was two receptor and not We no evidence of expression of receptors or or receptors in HeLa cells. The functional effects of of Gαs were silencing of Gαs not inhibition of or of phospholipase Cβ activity by not These data the and specificity of activation of adenylyl cyclases using and the of approach to study G protein signaling in a of cells. of Gαq and on of and with and cell receptor activation of PLCβ, catalyzes the of from accumulation in HeLa cells was following activation of the receptor by The of Gαq and as eliminated accumulation the silencing of Gαq or accumulation by the fact that concentrations of in HeLa cells of Gαq by The of was in cells Gαq/11, that and activities were inhibition of adenylyl cyclase not of on of subunits from cell receptors to a variety of intracellular PubMed Scopus Google for inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. in HeLa cells can be by and silencing each of the subunits, or in combinations of we observed no in the of the receptor to not or We observed a in the of such inhibition Gαi subunits were receptors no specificity for isoforms for the inhibition of or of specifically with inhibition of that a adenylyl cyclase may with or to G is most that silencing of subunits not inhibition of by inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity in was eliminated by of cells with that the Gαi subunit expression may have been that subunits, in the of subunits, may have to the inhibition of J. PubMed Google Scholar). silencing of a and no on inhibition of that was not in these cells. of Gα in of Gα of individual G protein α subunits in of more than of that by in of Gα proteins revealed that the concentrations of and 2) and not were not by such we observed in concentrations of protein following of or in and protein after silencing of of the isoform of Gαi in accumulation of the other two isoforms of accumulation of protein was associated with a in for protein The of protein also after of Gαi subunits These data that in the concentrations of Gαi isoforms are associated with compensatory changes in the of other proteins the Gαi Gα and Gβ protein expression following select G protein subunit silencing in a we substantially concentrations of and protein following the of Gαq, Gα11, or of these proteins as and in These changes in protein concentrations were by in for and with the fact that the amounts of and Gαq are observed effects are to be by of of Gα to these data that proteins regulate or the of of and of Gαq and accumulation of and the reciprocal was not a in Gαq protein was observed following of and in of were also about in cells protein not the effects on protein concentrations were not examined of lot of the in of of the effects of Gα protein on G protein apparently a in HeLa cells in of protein of and protein expression of Gαs, Gαq, was A and and We also examined the effects of silencing Gα protein expression on Gβ subunits and and in some specific effects were were not by of the relative concentrations of the proteins or other to silencing of Gαs, Gα11, or individual Gαi isoforms and accumulation of the least prevalent Gβ of Gαs also of whereas silencing of while effects on other Gβ The of the Gαi proteins as the total Gβ subunit by more than accumulation of Gβ protein was associated with Gβ following of Gαs and the of was not with changes in of Gβ of and Gβ in of G subunits were for silencing in to the of combinations of Gα and Gβ subunits that be prevalent in vivo, of Gβ subunits, and regulation of Gβ subunit targeting of or in of more than of protein and in changes were observed in Gβ proteins or following the silencing of individual Gβ proteins, and to following silencing of protein was after or of expression of individual Gβ isoforms to largely of other individual Gα proteins are by with PubMed Scopus Google we that of a single Gβ subunit the of cognate Gα Gβ subunits 10 Gα proteins, are of in accumulation of Gαs and of and and silencing Gαq and while and and accumulation of Gα proteins was not well with changes in and not with the that of examining these of Gβ an in is of and with the in protein with These Gβ effects on accumulation of Gα protein are with the of combinations of Gα and Gβ subunits in HeLa cells. of individual Gβ isoforms not concentrations of Gα11, and that Gαs, Gαi3, and are stable than Gα11, and in the of Gβ or that the more among other Gβ subunits. further on these we the effects of silencing of Gβ subunits. of and was with of two targeting as or as of with the and open reading silencing of and eliminated Gαi in with a study PubMed Scopus Google in the Gαi subfamily protein was in a cultured cell line following the of and Gαs protein expression was at of the of and as were Gαq, and each Gα subfamily was the of of the Gβ expression of some Gα proteins in cells not be attributed to of these Gα subunits expression of Gα subunits was following the silencing of Gβ isoforms and Gα protein concentrations following of Gβ subunits of changes in of Gα subunit that Gβ subunits are for the of Gα The of some Gα subunits in cells the protein was of of with concentrations of and protein was in cells and were protein was after with siRNA against a of protein was established the relative after with that after there was no in the same of and Gβ of of two substantially activation of by of on the other little on activity. The data that at least one of the and receptors Gαs associated with in HeLa cells. of specificity is of the that was specifically for receptor-mediated inhibition of not or adenylyl cyclase activity. was following the silencing of or studies that of activity in cells may have been at least in by a compensatory in the receptor of and for in Cells and no in receptor with cells. of individual Gβ subunits not activation of and little for specific Gβ isoforms was observed for receptor-dependent inhibition of or and and data not We then examined the effects of of and on effector these proteins for of the total Gβ in cells. accumulation of was whereas receptor-mediated inhibition of was by at least and These data that the and function of the Gαq subfamily of Gαs proteins not the Gαi members largely under silencing of Gβ subunits largely abrogated accumulation of and protein was in cells and silencing of and not the of that following the of also not adenylyl cyclase is not Gαs concentrations are well under and activities were in cells with one siRNA at and not the other revealed that Gαs protein concentrations were in cells with than in with The may be attributed to a Gβ subunit silencing of the with the not in relative protein expression were observed for other Gα subunit not We a of that for the after silencing with the a of adenylyl a in cells of was with cells was noted in the of to a and Cells that were to a of demonstrated to a of accumulation than cells not be attributed to receptor or activity not in and with a of INE, PGE1, and at in cells expression and cells with a of Gαs Nature. 1991; PubMed Scopus Google were not with activity of an of with subunits. We also expression of Gαi isoforms in cells and to the of Gαi subunits not the agonist-dependent and adenylyl cyclase was by silencing or not or adenylyl cyclase activity was in cells silencing of and by and not silencing with effects on not with of the mechanisms is that the of Gαi to the adenylyl cyclase activity in cells and we examined the of concentrations of adenylyl cyclase There are genes that adenylyl are activated by Gαs are by Gαi, proteins, J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). revealed that HeLa cells express and there was no evidence of or using a variety of and total RNA from cells or cells of plasma revealed that concentrations of and were and in from cells with of of and changes in were observed for of the expressed in HeLa cells not concentrations of and in with the fact that accumulation of of amounts of Gα, provide an for the and in cells and of Gγ cells express Gγ We sought to the expression of Gγ subunits using siRNA while the effects on The and specificity of targeting Gγ subunits were by of with expression encoding proteins of individual Gγ subunits for of the Gγ subunits and the of the individual was than not of Gγ to signaling specificity specific and to Gγ study of the fact that concentrations of G protein subunits are by a variety of mechanisms and that these effects can as well to cognate receptors and effectors. also a that other than perturbations of such be to for the of their on the proteins and not on more of these two of and in HeLa cells in a in is to an of Gαs, can substantially of at least two isoforms of adenylyl The is an to was also in of Gαi a in for changes in Gγ subunits as were not further were these changes in these of Gα and Gβ in HeLa of no other study there has been comprehensive of G protein α and subunits in a cell HeLa cells similar total amounts of Gα and Gβ proteins, that subunits are largely as of Gα is a for the of the between Gα and silencing of the Gβ subunits in these cells in of Gα Gα subunits and each one of the Gα were the most prevalent Gα proteins and for of the total Gα to the prevalent that of Gαi proteins that of Gαs or Gαq/11, HeLa cells amounts of Gαs, Gα11, and total with amounts of The of the amounts of the members are at least to some or the amounts of Gαi proteins in are of Gα for of G protein such as the specific for Gαs to adenylyl to PLCβ, and to Gα were The effects of silencing Gαs on agonist-dependent signaling were one and one functional activation of through receptors is more Gα proteins, Gαq and Gα11, are to the same of silencing of Gαq or of of the fact that concentrations of of Gαq by studies that Gαq and are at J. 1993; PubMed Google is that specific localization or be to For example, a of the expressed in HeLa cells is to receptors specificity was among the Gαi proteins receptor-mediated inhibition of or adenylyl cyclase activity was examined, silencing of specifically with receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl silencing of with of accumulation by not INE, and we observed no of on other signaling pathways. There to be between at least one Gαs, and the for these apparent are of Gβ Gα of Gβ subunits expressed in HeLa cells in of each Gα Gα for an in subunits Gα proteins in cells. A G and cell is little G receptor-mediated signaling data the of Gα protein in cells Gβ subunits are in to a study the apparent of Gα subunits in a cell line PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The and demonstrated that Gαi proteins modified with and were more stable than Gα subunits one We that the observed between the two cell may be of the of proteins that the of with subunits or that the of of the Gαi proteins may substantially in the two cells. We that amounts of and after silencing of and We that may be a of the intrinsic of exchange that these Gα of exchange in the is are high intrinsic for or interactions with other of Gβ for a specific Gβ isoform was revealed for or receptor-dependent modulation of effector as noted some of functional specificity was for of receptors to adenylyl was that activation of was was with There are a of that the of signaling under The of these the in adenylyl cyclase concentrations noted after silencing of and of the such as the of and may have and adenylyl cyclase signaling from plasma J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). study also revealed some about the least well of the Gβ subunits. The of is more than identical to of and is expressed C. W. PubMed Scopus Google and to and in vitro C. W. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). We that has the to G receptor-dependent signaling by with and the of and to in cells that and There to be in the regulation of expression of with that of and was the Gβ subunit protein expression was or following of more than one Gα With the of of protein was with that Gαs, Gαi3, and in some expression of of the not accumulation of and whereas the of and a on of of a specific G protein subunit in accumulation of a member of the same of the prevalent the of and whereas of of proteins the accumulation of The between expression of and isoforms is noted of these effects to be some The is Gαq and Gα11, compensatory were not observed following of was of an apparently reciprocal relationship between expression of members of the Gαq and Gαi of Gαq or accumulation of and of in accumulation of The significance is not is also that of and following the of Gα and Gβ is of some as is about the specific signaling by is in there has been no associated with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The of Gβ G protein members. We changes in the amounts of receptors with the of and of adenylyl cyclase and were receptor expression with a in for the receptor in cells protein to of changes in We do not if the changes in adenylyl cyclases are a of of and in of Gαs, or other of Gαs adenylyl cyclase and expression that Gαs to the regulation of adenylyl cyclase We on the generality of the specific interactions that are revealed by these in HeLa cells. revealed many changes in G protein subunit expression and specific interactions are to be on the specific cell the of and relative of G protein subunits. studies using cells and reveal the generality of such is from study that G protein signaling in HeLa cells are and in their to regulation of in the face of The mechanisms used to are and be a to understand and to the concentrations and activities of the many of such are to and to the that We and C. for and and for We also B. and G. for reading of the and for with
Krumins et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: