We discuss the development of a methodology for reasoning about properties of security policies. We view a security policy as a special case of regulation which specifies what actions some agents are permitted, obliged or forbidden to perform and we formalize a policy by a set of deontic formulae. We first address the problem of checking policy consistency and describe a method for solving it. The second point we are interested in is how to query a policy to know the actual norms which apply to a given situation. In order to provide the user with consistent answers, the normative conflicts which may appear in the policy must be solved. For doing so, we suggest using the notion of roles and define priorities between roles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cholvy et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: