Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 8, 2008FEMS Immunology & Medical MicrobiologyOpen Access

A comparison of three molecular typing methods for the discrimination ofSalmonella entericaserovar Infantis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

IRIan L. RossThe University of QueenslandMHMichael W. HeuzenroederSouth Australia Pathology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Ross et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22d28cbfc33eef9fb6e897https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2008.00435.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Molecular Typing of <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Serovar Typhi Isolates from Various Countries in Asia by a Multiplex PCR Assay on Variable-Number Tandem Repeats2003 · 92 citations
  2. 2Variable Number of Tandem Repeats in <i>Salmonella enterica</i> subsp. <i>enterica</i> for Typing Purposes2004 · 129 citations
  3. 3Mitomycin-induced synthesis of a Shiga-like toxin from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli H.I.81993 · 39 citations
  4. 4Discrimination within Phenotypically Closely Related Definitive Types of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium by the Multiple Amplification of Phage Locus Typing Technique2005 · 55 citations
  5. 5Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing1995 · 8,236 citations