Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Evaluate the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea ( OSA ) in patients with retinal vein occlusion ( RVO ). Methods A prospective and controlled study including 114 patients from January to September 2016, who were divided into two groups: 69 patients with RVO ( RVO +) and 45 controls ( RVO −), matched for age, sex and disease. All the patients completed a simple questionnaire and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and underwent a RUS leeping ® (portable monitoring device and then continuously monitored the subject's respiration to detect respiratory events). In addition, all patients with RVO were administered OSA screening with a polysomnography ( PSG ) during an overnight stay in the hospital, which was analysed by a single sleep apnea specialist. Results Sleep apnea was suspected in 73.9% in the RVO group and 63% in the control group based on the simple questionnaire; 22% in the RVO group and 4.3% in the control group according to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale; 82.6% in the RVO group and 55.6% in the control group (p = 0.005) according to RUS leeping ® . Multivariate logistic regression analysis (based on RU sleeping ® ) confirmed that RVO was associated with OSA (adjusted odds ratio, 5.65, [1.60–19.92], p = 0.007). All patients in the RVO group were confirmed by PSG , and finally, 91.5% were diagnosed with moderate‐to‐severe OSA . Among the RVO + patients, the mean apnea–hypopnoea index ( AHI ) was 42.2 events per hour (7.7–96.5). OSA was moderate in 22% patients and severe in 69.5% patients. There was no significant relationship between RVO severity and the PSG data variables. Conclusion The systematic screening of OSA with the gold standard PSG found a high prevalence of OSA in patients with RVO . The OSA is probably a risk factor associated with RVO . Polysomnography remains the gold standard method; nevertheless, the RU sleeping ® RTS portable monitoring device can assess the presence and severity of sleep apnea with a low failure rate and a single use, prior to PSG , which is less available in clinical practice. Further studies with larger samples are needed to clarify the association.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agard et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: