Why the study?
Does allopurinol improve adrenergic inotropic responsiveness in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure?
Does allopurinol improve adrenergic inotropic responsiveness in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Allopurinol improves LV systolic function at rest and during adrenergic stimulation and exercise in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure.
BACKGROUND: Superoxide (O(2)(-)) generated by enhanced xanthine oxidase (XO) activity may contribute to the increased myocardial oxidative stress in heart failure (CHF). Because blocking XO with allopurinol augments myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity in reperfusion injury and CHF, we hypothesized that it may improve adrenergic inotropic responsiveness in CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the effect of allopurinol on the contractile response to dobutamine and exercise in 7 chronically instrumented conscious dogs before and after producing CHF by rapid pacing. Left ventricular (LV) contractile performance was measured by the slopes of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relation (E(ES)) and stroke work-end-diastolic volume relation (M(SW)). Before CHF, allopurinol produced no change in LV contractile performance and did not alter the response to dobutamine or exercise. After CHF, allopurinol produced significant (P:<0.05) increases in E(ES) (5.0+/-0.6 versus 3.3+/-0.6 mm Hg/mL) and M(SW). Dobutamine and allopurinol produced greater increases in E(ES) (5.4+/-0.6 versus 7.4+/-0.6 mm Hg/mL) and M(SW) (60.1+/-7.4 versus 73.7+/-4.4 mm Hg) than did dobutamine alone. After allopurinol, dP/dt(max), stroke volume, and M(SW) were higher during CHF exercise. LV diastolic pressures were lower during CHF exercise after allopurinol. CONCLUSIONS: Allopurinol has no discernable effects on LV contractile function or adrenergic responsiveness in normal, conscious animals. In pacing-induced CHF, however, allopurinol improves LV systolic function at rest and during adrenergic stimulation and exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ukai et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: