The goal of this study was to compare MR-based PET patient attenuation correction (AC) to CT-based AC in the head using clinical whole-body FDG-PET patient data obtained from a tri-modality PET/CT & MR setup. The MR-based AC utilizes an atlas-based approach, registering the patient's MR images to a CT-based atlas, producing `pseudoCT' images. Thirteen clinical whole-body FDG patients were included in this study. PET mean activity concentration values were measured and compared in six ~ 15 ml volumes-of-interest throughout the brain tissue. The AC methods compared to CT-based AC were segmentation of the CT (air, fat, soft tissue) and atlas-based MR-AC. Results: PET activity concentration was systematically under-estimated on average by 1.32 kBq/ml (4.9%) when using the segmented CT-based AC, mainly due to lack of attenuation correction for skull bone. Using the atlas-based method, the error was reduced to 0.03 kBq/ml (0.2%) on average. PET image visualization demonstrated spatial variations in activity concentration accuracy induced by the AC methods that were consistent with the approximations in each method. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the atlas-based AC in the head provides adequate PET quantitation and image quality as compared to methods that do not account for bone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wollenweber et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: