THE ROLE OF CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION: A SHIFT FROM THE BOLAM STANDARD? Ash Samanta, Ash Samanta Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Michelle M. Mello, Michelle M. Mello Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Charles Foster, Charles Foster Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar John Tingle, John Tingle Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Jo Samanta Jo Samanta Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar *Ash Samanta, Consultant Rheumatologist, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and Lecturer in Law, De Montfort University, ash.samanta@uhl-tr.nhs.co.uk. Michelle M. Mello, Associate Professor of Health Policy and Law, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health. Charles Foster, Barrister, Outer Temple Chambers, London. John Tingle, Barrister, Reader in Health Law, Nottingham Trent University. Jo Samanta, Solicitor, Lecturer in Law, De Montfort University. The authors wish to thank the two anonymous referees for their helpful and constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Author Notes Medical Law Review, Volume 14, Issue 3, Autumn 2006, Pages 321–366, https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwl010 Published: 10 August 2006
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samanta et al. (2006) studied this question.