Why the study?
Does independent component analysis improve the classification of heart sound signals compared to principal component analysis?
Does independent component analysis improve the classification of heart sound signals compared to principal component analysis?
Independent component analysis combined with a naive Bayes classifier provides highly accurate classification of heart sound signals.
May aid automated heart sound classification; hypothesis-generating pending prospective clinical validation.
The analysis of heart sound signals is a basic method for heart examination. It may indicate the presence of heart disorders and provide clinical information in the diagnostic process. In this study, a novel feature dimension reduction method based on independent component analysis (ICA) has been proposed for the classification of fourteen different heart sound types; the method was compared with principal component analysis. The feature vectors are classified by support vector machines, linear discriminant analysis, and naive Bayes (NB) classifiers using 10-fold cross validation. The ICA combined with NB achieves the highest average performance with a sensitivity of 98.53%, specificity of 99.89%, g-means of 99.21%, and accuracy of 99.79%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yücel Koçyiğit (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: