Ultradilute quantum droplets are an intriguing new state of matter, in which the attractive mean-field force can be balanced by the repulsive force from quantum fluctuations to avoid collapse. Here, we present a microscopic theory of ultradilute quantum droplets in three-, one-, and two-dimensional two-component Bose-Bose mixtures by generalizing the conventional Bogoliubov theory to include the bosonic pairing arising from the interspecies attraction. Our pairing theory is fully equivalent to a variational approach and hence gives an upper bound for the energy of quantum droplets. In three dimensions, we predict the existence of a strongly interacting Bose droplet at the crossover from Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) to BCS superfluids and map out the bosonic BEC-BCS crossover phase diagram. In one dimension, we find that the energy of the one-dimensional Bose droplet calculated by the pairing theory is in excellent agreement with the latest diffusion Monte Carlo simulation [L. Parisi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 105302 (2019)] for nearly all the interaction strengths at which quantum droplets exist. In two dimensions, we show that Bose droplets disappear and may turn into a solitonlike many-body bound state, when the interspecies attraction exceeds a critical value. Below the threshold, the pairing theory predicts more or less the same results as the Bogoliubov theory derived by D. S. Petrov and G. E. Astrakharchik [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100401 (2016)]. The predicted energies from both theories are higher than the diffusion Monte Carlo results due to the weak interspecies attraction and the increasingly important role played by the beyond-Bogoliubov-approximation effect in two dimensions. Our pairing theory provides an ideal starting point to understand interesting ground-state properties of quantum droplets in various dimensions, including their shape and collective oscillations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: