Key result
A non-contact mapping system rapidly identified the origin of human left atrial tachycardias and focal atrial fibrillation, guiding successful ablation.
Why the study?
Does a non-contact mapping system facilitate the identification and ablation of focal left atrial tachycardias and atrial fibrillation?
Observational
Does a non-contact mapping system facilitate the identification and ablation of focal left atrial tachycardias and atrial fibrillation?
A non-contact mapping system can rapidly identify the origins of focal left atrial tachycardias and atrial fibrillation to guide successful ablation.
Non-contact mapping may speed focal source localization in left atrial tachycardias; leaves open outcome benefit versus conventional mapping in prospective trials.
Focal left atrial (LA) tachycardias/ectopy (LATs) that may initiate atrial fibrillation (AF) are often difficult to initiate, non-sustained, and may have multiple origins, often in one or more pulmonary veins (PV). Thus, mapping with conventional techniques is often difficult. The authors tested the hypothesis that a non-contact mapping system capable of global simultaneous mapping of >3000 points in the LA, would facilitate ablation of LAT. The non-contact mapping system was able to rapidly identify the origin of human LATs and focal AF despite the infrequency and short duration of initiating ectopy and guide a conventional mapping catheter to successful ablation sites. The authors also observed that, although isoproterenol is the most successful method of initiating LATs, these originate from multiple sites and therefore appear to be of limited clinical significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markides et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Focal atrial fibrillation and left atrial tachycardias. Non-contact mapping system was evaluated on Identification of LAT origin and successful ablation. A non-contact mapping system rapidly identified the origin of human left atrial tachycardias and focal atrial fibrillation, guiding successful ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: