This article reviews the literature on the contrasting-groups standard-setting method and describes 2 versions of the method—the person-focused version and the response-focused version. Of the 2, the response-focused version is preferable. It can be enhanced by adopting some practices of the modified Angoff method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul R. Brandon (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: