The notions of essence and accident play important and unobjectionable roles in pre-analytic or pre-philosophical thought and discourse. These roles are familiar, and need no elaboration here. Philosophers cannot ignore them, but must either explain them or (somehow) explain them away. My interest is in explaining them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Irving M. Copi (1954) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: