Key result
Rate control and rhythm control for post-cardiac surgery AF showed equivalent freedom from AF at follow-up (84.2-91% vs 84.2-96%) and hospital length of stay.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether clinical outcomes differ between rate or rhythm control strategies for post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation.
Does a rhythm control strategy improve clinical outcomes compared to a rate control strategy in patients with post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation?
Systematic Review
Does a rhythm control strategy improve clinical outcomes compared to a rate control strategy in patients with post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation?
Rate and rhythm control strategies appear equivalent for managing post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation.
Supports rate or rhythm control interchangeably for post-cardiac surgery AF; reinforces equivalence in systematic evidence.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol addressing the question 'for post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation (AF), do clinical outcomes differ between rate or rhythm control strategies?' Altogether, 2174 papers were found using the reported searches, of which 5 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Hospital length of stay ranged from 5.0 to 13.2 days for rate control and 5.2 to 10.3 days for rhythm control. Freedom from AF at follow up was achieved in 84.2-91 and 84.2-96% in rate and rhythm control groups respectively. Minimal serious adverse events were noted in all studies analysed and there was no difference between rate and rhythm control groups. We conclude that in the management of post-cardiac surgery, AF, rate control and rhythm control are equivalent in terms of hospital length of stay, freedom from arrhythmia at follow up and complication rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conte et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation. Rate control vs. Rhythm control was evaluated on Hospital length of stay and freedom from AF at follow up. Rate control and rhythm control for post-cardiac surgery AF showed equivalent freedom from AF at follow-up (84.2-91% vs 84.2-96%) and hospital length of stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: