Key result
Low cumulative socioeconomic status was not significantly associated with incident type 2 diabetes overall (HR 1.04), though age-stratified analyses showed increased risk that attenuated after adjusting for lifestyle factors.
Why the study?
While individual socioeconomic status indicators associate with incident type 2 diabetes, the association of cumulative socioeconomic status and incident type 2 diabetes is unclear, especially in African American adults.
Does low cumulative socioeconomic status increase the risk of incident type 2 diabetes in African American adults?
Cohort (n=3,681)
Does low cumulative socioeconomic status increase the risk of incident type 2 diabetes in African American adults?
Hazard Ratio: 1.04 (95% CI 0.85–1.28)
Low cumulative socioeconomic status is associated with an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes across different age groups in African American adults, though this risk is largely mediated by behavioral and lifestyle factors.
Low SES-linked T2D risk in younger African Americans attenuates with lifestyle adjustment; leaves open whether SES interventions add benefit beyond behavior change.
Background: The cumulative socioeconomic status (SES) model posits that childhood and adult experiences accumulate to influence disease risk. While individual SES indicators such as education and income are independently associated with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), the association of cumulative SES and incident T2D is unclear, especially in African American adults. Methods: We utilized cohort data of African American participants (n = 3681, mean age 52.6 years) enrolled in the Jackson Heart Study from 2000 to 2013 free of T2D or cardiovascular disease at baseline (2000-2004). Cumulative SES scores at baseline were derived using six SES indicators (education, wealth, income, occupation, employment status, and mother's education) categorized as low, middle, and high. Incident T2D was defined at exam 2 (2005-2008) or exam 3 (2009-2013) based on fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL, HbA1c ≥ 6.5, reported diabetic medication use, or self-reported physician diagnosis. Proportional hazards regression, allowing for interval censoring, was used to estimate the association between cumulative SES and incident T2D (hazard ratio(HR), 95% confidence interval (CI)) after adjustment for covariates. Sex and age differences were tested using interaction terms. Results: >0.05). However, there were differences by (age p value for interaction = 0.0052 for middle-aged adults and 0.0186 for older adults). Low (versus high) cumulative SES was associated a greater hazard of incident T2D among those 20-46 years (HR 1.12 [95% CI 1.03, 1.21]), 47-59 years (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.06, 1.47]) and those 60-93 years (HR 1.39 [95% CI 1.09, 1.78]) after adjustment for sex and family history of diabetes. Associations attenuated after adding behavioral and lifestyle risk factors. Conclusion: The association of low cumulative SES and incident T2D differed by age, which may suggest interventionist should consider impacts of SES on T2D by age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glover et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Incident type 2 diabetes (n=3,681). Low cumulative socioeconomic status vs. High cumulative socioeconomic status was evaluated on Incident type 2 diabetes (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85, 1.28). Low cumulative socioeconomic status was not significantly associated with incident type 2 diabetes overall (HR 1.04), though age-stratified analyses showed increased risk that attenuated after adjusting for lifestyle factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: