Study characterizes gravitational waveforms in rotating black hole mergers, suggesting new understanding of dynamics.
We study the gravitational waveforms generated by critical, equatorial plunging geodesics of the Kerr metric that start from an unstable-circular-orbit, which describe the test-mass limit of spin-aligned eccentric black hole mergers. The waveforms are generated employing a time-domain eukolsky code. We span different values of the Kerr spin <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mo>−</a:mo><a:mn>0.99</a:mn><a:mo>≤</a:mo><a:mi>a</a:mi><a:mo>≤</a:mo><a:mn>0.99</a:mn></a:math> and of the critical eccentricity <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>e</c:mi><c:mi>c</c:mi></c:msub></c:math>, for bound (<e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mn>0</e:mn><e:mo>≤</e:mo><e:msub><e:mi>e</e:mi><e:mi>c</e:mi></e:msub><e:mo><</e:mo><e:mn>1</e:mn></e:math>) and unbound plunges (<g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msub><g:mi>e</g:mi><g:mi>c</g:mi></g:msub><g:mo>≥</g:mo><g:mn>1</g:mn></g:math>). We find that, contrary to expectations, the waveform modes <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msub><i:mi>h</i:mi><i:mrow><i:mo>ℓ</i:mo><i:mi>m</i:mi></i:mrow></i:msub></i:math> do not always manifest a peak for high eccentricities or spins. In case of the dominant <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msub><k:mi>h</k:mi><k:mn>22</k:mn></k:msub></k:math> mode, we determine the precise region of the parameter space in which its peak exists. In this region, we provide a characterization of the merger quantities of the <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msub><m:mi>h</m:mi><m:mn>22</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> mode and of the higher-order modes, providing the merger structure of the equatorial-eccentric plunges of the Kerr spacetime in the test-mass limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faggioli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: