Key result
Local delivery of methotrexate and heparin via polymer-coated intracoronary stents did not significantly reduce mean neointimal area or percent lumen area stenosis compared to uncoated stents.
Why the study?
Does local delivery of heparin and/or methotrexate via polymer-coated stents inhibit neointimal proliferation in a porcine model of coronary stenting?
RCT (n=40)
Randomly divided into four treatment groups
Does local delivery of heparin and/or methotrexate via polymer-coated stents inhibit neointimal proliferation in a porcine model of coronary stenting?
Local delivery of methotrexate and heparin via polymer-coated intracoronary stents failed to inhibit neointimal smooth muscle cell proliferation in a porcine model.
Does not support methotrexate or heparin stent coatings; leaves open whether alternative agents can limit neointimal proliferation.
Background Multiple systemic agents have not prevented restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Attention has focused more recently on developing local drug delivery systems that achieve significant focal concentrations of agents potentially effective against restenosis. Recent advances in polymer design allow specific drugs to be eluted within a defined period after polymer binding onto intracoronary stents. Preliminary results suggested heparin and methotrexate may inhibit the neointimal smooth muscle cell proliferation involved in restenosis. We investigated whether a local drug delivery system involving polymer binding of methotrexate, heparin, or both agents onto an intracoronary stent would inhibit neointimal smooth muscle cell proliferation in a model involving oversized stenting of porcine coronary arteries. Methods Forty animals were randomly divided into four treatment groups. Ten pigs each received a flexible, balloon-expandable tantalum stent coated with a cellulose ester polymer that bound methotrexate, heparin, or a combination of both drugs; 10 animals received an uncoated tantalum control stent. All animals were fed a nonatherogenic diet and were killed 28 days after stenting. Morphometric analysis of stented arteries was performed; mean neointimal area and percent lumen area stenosis were compared between treatment groups. Results No statistically significant differences were found between treatment groups by 2 × 2 factorial analysis with respect to either mean neointimal area or percent lumen area stenosis. Conclusions This preliminary attempt to inhibit neointimal smooth muscle cell proliferation after vascular injury by local delivery of methotrexate and heparin with polymer-coated intracoronary stents was unsuccessful. Further efforts to refine polymer-based local drug delivery systems may involve more effective antiproliferative agents and more extensive surface areas for drug delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cox et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (n=40). Polymer-coated intracoronary stents delivering methotrexate, heparin, or both vs. Uncoated tantalum control stent was evaluated on Mean neointimal area and percent lumen area stenosis. Local delivery of methotrexate and heparin via polymer-coated intracoronary stents did not significantly reduce mean neointimal area or percent lumen area stenosis compared to uncoated stents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: