Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal models provide vital tools to explicate the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Accordingly, we established two atherosclerosis-prone mice models: (i) mice lacking the LDL (low-density lipoprotein) receptor (LDLR) and the ability to edit apo (apolipoprotein) B mRNA (Apobec1; designated LDb : LDLR-/- Apobec1-/-), and (ii) mice with the LDb background, who also overexpressed human apoB100 (designated LTp : LDLR-/- Apobec1-/- ERhB+/+). Both LDb and LTp mice had markedly elevated levels of LDL and increased levels of NEFAs (non-esterified fatty acids) compared with C57BL/6 wild-type mice. However, fasting glucose and insulin levels in both animals were not different than those in C57BL/6 wild-type mice. It has been suggested that PAF-AH (platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase) increases susceptibility to vascular disease. Both LDb and LTp mice had significantly higher PAF-AH mRNA levels compared with C57BL/6 wild-type mice. PAF-AH gene expression was also significantly influenced by age and sex. Interestingly, PAF-AH mRNA levels were significantly higher in both LTp male and female mice than in the LDb mice. This increased PAF-AH gene expression was associated with elevated plasma PAF-AH enzyme activities ( LTp > LDb > C57BL/6 ). Moreover, a greater proportion of PAF-AH activity was associated with the apoB-containing lipoproteins: 29% in LTp and 13% in LDb mice compared with C57BL/6 wild-type animals (6.7%). This may explain why LTp mice developed more atherosclerotic lesions than LDb mice by 8 months of age. In summary, increased plasma NEFAs, PAF-AH mRNA and enzyme activities are associated with accelerated atherogenesis in these animal models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: