Key result
Rapid atrial pacing at 220 msec initiated micro-reentry isthmus tachycardia, whereas pacing at 210 msec initiated sustained counterclockwise atrial flutter in a patient with typical atrial flutter.
Why the study?
How do different cycle lengths of rapid atrial pacing initiate different types of atrial reentrant tachycardias in a patient with typical atrial flutter?
Case Report (n=1)
How do different cycle lengths of rapid atrial pacing initiate different types of atrial reentrant tachycardias in a patient with typical atrial flutter?
The initiation of counterclockwise atrial flutter versus micro-reentry isthmus tachycardia depends on the extent of pacing-induced conduction block in the isthmus.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pacing cycle length may dictate microreentry versus flutter via isthmus block; hypothesis-generating and leaves open broader mechanistic confirmation.
We studied the modes of initiation of two types of atria] reentrant tachycardias (i.e., microreentry isthmus tachycardia and counterclockwise atrial flutter) in a 39‐year‐old male with typical atrial flutter. Rapid atrial pacing from proximal coronary sinus at a cycle length of 220 msec initiated micro‐reentry isthmus tachycardia (non‐sustained), while rapid atrial pacing at a cycle length of 210 msec initiated sustained atrial flutter circulating counterclockwise around the tricuspid annulus. It was suggested that initiation of the counterclockwise atrial flutter was associated with a pacing‐induced conduction block in the entire width of the isthmus, whereas initiation of the micro‐reentry isthmus tachycardia was associated with a pacing‐induced conduction block in a limited segment of the isthmus (i.e., partial isthmus block).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noda et al. (2005) conducted a case report in Typical atrial flutter (n=1). Rapid atrial pacing at different cycle lengths (220 msec vs 210 msec) was evaluated on Modes of initiation of atrial reentrant tachycardias. Rapid atrial pacing at 220 msec initiated micro-reentry isthmus tachycardia, whereas pacing at 210 msec initiated sustained counterclockwise atrial flutter in a patient with typical atrial flutter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: