Why the study?
Does a former elite athletic background reduce the prevalence of behavioral and biological risk factors for chronic disease compared to nonathletes?
Does a former elite athletic background reduce the prevalence of behavioral and biological risk factors for chronic disease compared to nonathletes?
Being a former elite athlete is associated with a significantly lower prevalence of major behavioral and biological risk factors for chronic diseases later in life.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support lower behavioral risks post-elite sport; leaves open causality for chronic disease prevention in prospective studies.
This cross-sectional study examined whether the prevalence of behavioral and biological risk factors of former elite athletes (both men and women), differed from nonelite athletes and nonathletes. A total of 491 individuals (225 former elite athletes, 168 former nonelite athletes, and 98 nonathletes) participated in this study. Major behavioral and biological risk factors identified in the 2002 World Health Report were assessed. Apart from alcohol consumption, former elite athletes had at least 70% lower likelihood than nonathletes for the other behavioral risk factors. Regarding biological factors, being overweight/obesity seems to be the one where minor differences exist, with a significant odds ratio only among female former elite athletes (0.09, p < 0.001) when compared to nonathletes. In general, the results showed healthy outcomes among former elite athletes. Albeit the results extend to both sexes, women appear to have slightly healthier outcomes. Being a former athlete, especially at an elite level, seems to be associated with decreased risk factors for major chronic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batista et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: