Purpose This study aims to offer insight into the applications of multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA) within organizational behavior (OB) studies, specifically when using macro-level variables. The authors used the case of a scale measuring collective organizational engagement (COE) to demonstrate the advantage of using MCFA over single-level confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Design/methodology/approach The authors used nine referent-shift items to measure the dimensions of physical, cognitive and emotional COE. MCFA and aggregated single-level CFA were conducted on the same data using Mplus V. 8.7, and the authors compared standardized parameters from the two techniques. Findings The results indicate a three-factor model of collective engagement with CFA and MCFA. Stronger item loadings, factor correlations and composite reliability were found in the MCFA within-level model compared to aggregated CFA model. MCFA also supported an alternate one-factor-between-three-factors-within model of COE. Originality/value This study demonstrates the application of MCFA with a compositional construct and compares MCFA to mean-aggregated single-level CFA. It presents a case for OB researchers to apply MCFA to compositional constructs as a best methodological practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganesh et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: