Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-quality impact evaluations, including randomised experiments, are increasingly popular, but cannot always inform resource allocation decisions unless the costs of interventions are considered alongside their effects. Cost-effectiveness analysis is a straightforward but under-utilised tool for determining which of two or more interventions provides a (non-pecuniary) unit of effect at least cost. This paper reviews the framework and methods of cost-effectiveness analysis, emphasising education and health interventions, and discusses how the methods are currently applied in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick J. McEwan (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: