Key result
Community lifestyle intervention linked to self-reported health improvements in ~71% with poor baseline health.
Why the study?
Does the Västerbotten Intervention Programme improve self-reported health in a middle-aged population?
Cohort (n=101,396)
Does the Västerbotten Intervention Programme improve self-reported health in a middle-aged population?
The program successfully improved health perception among high-risk individuals but highlights the need to maintain health in seemingly healthy populations.
May warrant targeted maintenance for those with good baseline SRH; leaves open causal programme effects in this observational cohort.
AIM: The Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) addresses cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the middle-aged population of Västerbotten County, Sweden. Self-reported health (SRH) is one of the risk factors for both conditions. The aim of this study was to analyse the development patterns of SRH among the VIP participants. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 1990 to 2007 were used to analyse the prevalence of poor SRH among 101,396 VIP participants aged 40-60 years. Panel data were used to study the change in SRH among 25,695 persons aged 30-60 years, who participated in the VIP twice within a 10-year interval. RESULTS: Prevalence of poor SRH fluctuated between 1990 and 2007 in Västerbotten County. There was a temporary decline around 2000, with SRH continuously improving thereafter. The majority of panel participants remained in good SRH; over half of those with poor or fair SRH at baseline reported better SRH at follow-up. SRH declined in 19% of the panel participants, mostly among those who had good SRH at the baseline. The decline was common among both women and men, in all educational, age and marital status groups. CONCLUSIONS: The SRH improvement among those with poor and fair SRH at baseline suggests that VIP has been successful in addressing its target population. However, the deterioration of SRH among 21% of the individuals with good SRH at baseline is of concern. From a public health perspective, it is important for health interventions to address not only the risk group but also those with a healthy profile to prevent the negative development among the seemingly healthy participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blomstedt et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in General middle-aged population at risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes (n=101,396). Västerbotten Intervention Programme was evaluated on Change in self-reported health (SRH) at 10-year follow-up. At 10-year follow-up, self-reported health improved in 71% of participants with poor baseline health, while it deteriorated in 21% of those with good baseline health.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: