Why the study?
Performance is usually assessed by simple indices from cardiac and respiratory data during graded exercise tests, but the utility of a dynamical analysis of these data remains to be tested.
Does dynamical analysis of heart rate and oxygen consumption during graded exercise tests accurately characterize physical performance in athletes?
Does dynamical analysis of heart rate and oxygen consumption during graded exercise tests accurately characterize physical performance in athletes?
Dynamical analysis of HR and VO2 during effort tests, particularly the estimation of gain, provides a robust characterization of physical performance even with submaximal effort.
May support submaximal dynamical VO2 analysis for tracking athlete performance; leaves open validation versus VO2max in clinical cohorts.
Performance is usually assessed by simple indices stemming from cardiac and respiratory data measured during graded exercise test. The goal of this study is to test the interest of using a dynamical analysis of these data. Therefore, two groups of 32 and 14 athletes from two different cohorts performed two different graded exercise testing before and after a period of training or deconditioning. Heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) were measured. The new dynamical indices were the value without effort, the characteristic time and the amplitude (gain) of the HR and VO 2 response to the effort. The gain of HR was moderately to strongly associated with other performance indices, while the gain for VO 2 increased with training and decreased with deconditioning with an effect size slightly higher than VO 2 max. Dynamical analysis performed on the first 2/3 of the effort tests showed similar patterns than the analysis of the entire effort tests, which could be useful to assess individuals who cannot perform full effort tests. In conclusion, the dynamical analysis of HR and VO 2 obtained during effort test, especially through the estimation of the gain, provides a good characterization of physical performance, robust to less stringent effort test conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mongin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: