This study calculates the cost of subsistence and respectability consumption baskets to derive ‘welfare ratios’ for 11 cities in the J apanese E mpire as defined by A llen and his colleagues. Nominal wages tended to be higher where higher prices prevailed, and vice versa. Prices and nominal wages remained highest in J apan and lowest in M anchuria, with K orea and T aiwan being placed in between. Welfare ratios remained roughly comparable in the 1910s in the imperial cities outside M anchuria, where unskilled workers enjoyed substantially higher living standards. Interwar decades saw real wages rise in T okyo, but fall in D alian, which caused convergence in workers' income levels. Wage divergence occurred within M anchuria, as workers in S henyang and C hangchun enjoyed an improving welfare ratio. Real wages rose more slowly in K orean and T aiwanese than in J apanese cities. Replacing a subsistence lifestyle with a ‘respectable’ lifestyle yields a significantly different picture of the evolution of the real wage gap within the empire, which contradicts findings reported by existing studies in important respects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myung Soo (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: