Why the study?
Personalized arrhythmia simulations have the potential to improve diagnosis and guide therapy, prompting the introduction of a computational framework for personalized simulations of ventricular electrophysiology incorporating scar.
Can a personalized ventricular arrhythmia simulation framework based on MRI-detected scar replicate clinically observed PVCs and VF?
Can a personalized ventricular arrhythmia simulation framework based on MRI-detected scar replicate clinically observed PVCs and VF?
A personalized computational framework can simulate ventricular electrophysiology based on MRI-detected scar and replicate PVCs, but accurate VF induction may require personalized stress test modeling.
Simple protocols insufficient for VF in personalized scar models; leaves open need for tailored stress testing before clinical translation.
Personalized arrhythmia simulations have the potential to improve diagnosis and guide therapy. Here, we introduce a computational framework for personalized simulations of ventricular electrophysiology (EP) incorporating scar. This framework was utilized in a patient who had ventricular fibrillation (VF).From delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) an anatomical model was constructed. Regions of scar and border zone were segmented by thresholding. EP was then simulated using CARPentry. The Ten Tusscher ventricular EP model was adapted locally to reflect healthy, border zone or scar tissue. In this patient, three distinct premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) were identified using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), one of which induced VF. The clinically observed PVCs were replicated in the virtual model to study arrhythmia development, but VF could not be reproduced with a simple stimulation protocol that disregarded patient-specific conditions present at the time of actual VF induction. This could indicate that not only the virtual heart model, but also the stress test may need to be personalized for accurate arrhythmia simulations.In conclusion, this computational framework enables EP simulations based on MRI-detected scar, and allows to study the amount of personalization required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: