Key result
Adrenergic receptor densities and binding affinities did not differ between patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy, diabetic patients without neuropathy, and non-diabetic controls.
Why the study?
Do adrenergic receptor densities and affinities differ in patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy compared to those without neuropathy or non-diabetic controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=24)
Do adrenergic receptor densities and affinities differ in patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy compared to those without neuropathy or non-diabetic controls?
Measurements of cellular adrenergic receptors in vitro are a fallible index of sensitivity to catecholamines in vivo, as there is no generalized increase in adrenergic receptors in autonomic failure due to diabetic autonomic neuropathy.
Receptor measurements should not guide catecholamine sensitivity assessment in diabetic neuropathy; leaves open mechanisms of autonomic failure.
In view of evidence that neither interindividual nor induced intra-individual variations of adrenergic receptor status are related to metabolic or haemodynamic sensitivity to adrenaline in vivo, we took an alternative approach to assessment of the relevance of adrenergic receptor measurement by measuring these in a group of subjects with well-documented adrenergic denervation hypersensitivity, patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Mononuclear leukocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptor densities (and binding affinities), measured with 125I-labelled pindolol, and isoproterenol-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation, in samples from patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (n = 8), were no different from those in samples from patients with IDDM without neuropathy (n = 8), or from non-diabetic subjects (n = 8). In addition, platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor densities (and binding affinities), measured with 3H-labelled yohimbine, and adrenaline-induced suppression of cyclic AMP contents did not differ among the three groups. Thus, in contrast to idiopathic autonomic failure, there is no generalized increase in adrenergic receptors in autonomic failure due to diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Regardless of the mechanism of adrenergic denervation hypersensitivity in such patients, these data provide further evidence that measurements of cellular adrenergic receptors (and adenylate cyclase) in vitro are a fallible index of sensitivity to catecholamines in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dejgaard et al. (1991) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetic autonomic neuropathy (n=24). Diabetic autonomic neuropathy vs. IDDM without neuropathy and non-diabetic subjects was evaluated on Mononuclear leukocyte beta 2-adrenergic and platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor densities and binding affinities. Adrenergic receptor densities and binding affinities did not differ between patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy, diabetic patients without neuropathy, and non-diabetic controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: