Key result
Catheter ablation for AF linked to ~30% lower risk of cognitive impairment vs medical management.
Why the study?
The study was designed to examine associations between catheter ablation treatment versus medical management and cognitive impairment among older adults with atrial fibrillation.
Does catheter ablation prevent cognitive impairment in older adults with atrial fibrillation compared to medical management?
Cohort (n=887)
Yes
Does catheter ablation prevent cognitive impairment in older adults with atrial fibrillation compared to medical management?
Odds Ratio: 0.7 (95% CI 0.5–0.97)
Absolute Event Rate: 30.1% vs 44.8%
p-value: p=0.0002
In older adults with atrial fibrillation, prior catheter ablation is associated with a significantly lower risk of cognitive impairment over 2 years compared to medical management alone.
May support considering ablation to preserve cognition in older AF patients; leaves open causality and requires RCTs before practice change.
Objectives To examine the associations between catheter ablation treatment (CA) versus medical management and cognitive impairment among older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Ambulatory patients who had AF, were ≥ 65-years-old, and were eligible to receive oral anticoagulation could be enrolled into the SAGE (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements)-AF study from internal medicine and cardiology clinics in Massachusetts and Georgia between 2016 and 2018. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool at baseline, one-, and two years. Cognitive impairment was defined as a MoCA score ≤ 23. Multivariate-adjusted logistic regression of longitudinal repeated measures was used to examine associations between treatment with CA vs. medical management and cognitive impairment. Results 887 participants were included in this analysis. On average, participants were 75.2 ± 6.7 years old, 48.6% women, and 87.4% white non-Hispanic. 193 (21.8%) participants received a CA before enrollment. Participants who had previously undergone CA were significantly less likely to be cognitively impaired during the two-year study period ( aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97 ) than those medically managed (i.e., rate and/or rhythm control), even after adjusting with propensity score for CA. At the two-year follow-up a significantly greater number of individuals in the non-CA group were cognitively impaired (MoCA ≤ 23) compared to the CA-group (311 [44.8%] vs. 58 [30.1%], p=0.0002 ). Conclusions In this two-year longitudinal prospective cohort study participants who underwent CA for AF before enrollment were less likely to have cognitive impairment than those who had not undergone CA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srichawla et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=887). Catheter ablation vs. Medical management (rate and/or rhythm control) was evaluated on Cognitive impairment (MoCA score ≤23) over the two-year study period (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97, p=0.0002). Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with a significantly lower risk of cognitive impairment over 2 years compared to medical management (aOR 0.70).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: