Many critical pedagogy scholars claim that agency and dialogue in the classroom can only be achieved through students’ engagement in verbal deliberation to “voice” against oppressive actions. As current discourses in the critical pedagogy literature tend to consider silence as a negative attribute in the classroom, I argue that they privilege a western construct and a very particular way of being and thinking. By using performative pedagogy as a theoretical framework, it is imperative to discuss the macro and micro implications of how discourses in the critical pedagogy literature affect how we understand silence theoretically and pedagogically. Keywords: AgencyCritical PedagogyDialoguePerformative PedagogySilence Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Leda Cooks, John T. Warren, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. The author is also appreciative of Heidi Rose and David Penyak for their editorial recommendations. Additional informationNotes on contributorsRichie Neil Hao Richie Neil Hao is Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Denver
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richie Neil Hao (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: