PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2012BMC Public Health256 citationsOpen Access

Measuring patient activation in the Netherlands: translation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13)

JRJany RademakersJNJessica NijmanLHL. van der Hoek

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a 13-item instrument which assesses patient (or consumer) self-reported knowledge, skills and confidence for self-management of one's health or chronic condition. In this study the PAM was translated into a Dutch version; psychometric properties of the Dutch version were established and the instrument was validated in a panel of chronically ill patients. METHODS: The translation was done according to WHO guidelines. The PAM 13-Dutch was sent to 4178 members of the Dutch National Panel of people with Chronic illness or Disability (NPCD) in April 2010 (study A) and again to a sub sample of this group (N = 973) in June 2010 (study B). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and cross-validation with the SBSQ-D (a measure for Health literacy) were computed. The Dutch results were compared to similar Danish and American data. RESULTS: The psychometric properties of the PAM 13-Dutch were generally good. The level of internal consistency is good (α = 0.88) and item-rest correlations are moderate to strong. The Dutch mean PAM score (61.3) is comparable to the American (61.9) and lower than the Danish (64.2). The test-retest reliability was moderate. The association with Health literacy was weak to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The PAM-13 Dutch is a reliable instrument to measure patient activation. More research is needed into the validity of the Patient Activation Measure, especially with respect to a more comprehensive measure of Health literacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rademakers et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23aba5b7e293e61ca60a51https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-577
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper