Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In models with potentially weak identification, researchers often decide whether to report a robust confidence set based on an initial assessment of model identification. Two-step procedures of this sort can generate large coverage distortions for reported confidence sets, and existing procedures for controlling these distortions are quite limited. This paper introduces a generally applicable approach to detecting weak identification and constructing two-step confidence sets in GMM. This approach controls coverage distortions under weak identification and indicates strong identification, with probability tending to 1 when the model is well identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isaiah Andrews (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: