Key result
Cryo-EM structure determination revealed that the apical domain I cloverleaf of the EMCV IRES contacts ribosomal proteins uS13 and uS19, and the GNRA tetraloop interacts with initiator tRNA.
Why the study?
The JK domain of Type 2 IRESs is not sufficient for function, which also requires the preceding domain I of unknown function, leaving the mechanism of ribosomal recruitment unclear.
The study reveals the structural basis for ribosomal recruitment by Type 2 IRESs, highlighting essential interactions between domain I, ribosomal proteins, and initiator tRNA.
May inform antiviral targeting of IRES-ribosome contacts; leaves open conservation and functional necessity across Type 2 IRESs.
The encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) IRES and other Type 2 IRESs comprise domains H-L and specifically interact with eIF4G/eIF4A through their essential JK domain. However, the JK domain is not sufficient for IRES function, which also requires the preceding domain I of unknown function. To identify interactions that drive ribosomal recruitment of eIF4G/eIF4A-bound Type 2 IRESs, we determined the cryo-EM structure of 48S initiation complexes formed on the EMCV IRES. It revealed that the apical domain I cloverleaf contacts ribosomal proteins uS13 and uS19 via its Id subdomain and that the essential GNRA tetraloop in subdomain Ic interacts directly with the TψC domain of initiator tRNA. Functional assays supported the exceptional role of these interactions for initiation on this IRES. The strong conservation of primary and secondary structures of the apex of domain I among Type 2 IRESs suggests that the reported interactions are a common essential feature of them all.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattacharjee et al. (2025) studied Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) IRES translation initiation. Cryo-EM structure determination revealed that the apical domain I cloverleaf of the EMCV IRES contacts ribosomal proteins uS13 and uS19, and the GNRA tetraloop interacts with initiator tRNA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: