Randomized trial establishes new lower bounds for graph energy, implying enhanced understanding of graph spectra.
The concept of the energy of a graph was introduced by Gutman in 1978, inspired by the Hückel molecular orbital theory, which approximates the total [Formula: see text]-electron energy of a conjugated hydrocarbon molecule using the energy of its molecular graph. Let G be a graph on n vertices with m edges. In this paper, we first present two lower bounds for the energy of a graph. The first bound is based on the order n, the maximum degree [Formula: see text] and the determinant of the adjacency matrix [Formula: see text] The second bound relies on n, the minimum degree [Formula: see text] the independence number [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] We also determine extremal graphs for our lower bounds. In addition, we obtain an upper bound for the graph energy in terms of size m, the maximum degree [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] Next, we prove that for the general extended adjacency matrix [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] being the diagonal entries of [Formula: see text] the expression [Formula: see text] holds if and only if [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] Oboudi previously established that [Formula: see text] and proposed the problem of characterizing graphs with the spectrum [Formula: see text] for some non-negative integers [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] Here, we provide a generalization of Oboudi’s lower bound for the energy of graphs, and then characterize graphs with the above spectrum when [Formula: see text] We show that [Formula: see text] for all graphs having no eigenvalues in the interval (−1,1), where [Formula: see text] is the largest integer such that the star graph [Formula: see text] is an induced subgraph of G. We also prove that if the general extended matrix [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] for vertices [Formula: see text] has exactly one positive eigenvalue, then one of the components of G is a complete multipartite graph, while all other components, if any, are isolated vertices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakshith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: