Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates tracking control in an elastic beam system, suggesting effective control methodologies.
This paper develops a control-oriented finite-element (FE) formulation for a rolling ball interacting with an elastic simply supported Euler–Bernoulli beam actuated by a boundary torque at the left support. The beam is discretized using cubic Hermite elements, while the ball is modeled as a moving load with rotational dynamics governed by a no-slip rolling constraint. To retain the moving-contact effects within a fixed FE state dimension, global position-dependent interpolation operators are introduced to evaluate the beam deflection, slope, curvature, and contact-point velocity at the ball location. Applying Lagrange’s equations yields a coupled nonlinear model with a configuration-dependent inertia matrix and mixed-velocity coupling terms. A continuum of static equilibria parameterized by the ball position is then computed by enforcing static force balance together with a zero-slope rest condition at the contact point, providing consistent operating points for linearization and a position-dependent feedforward bias torque. Based on frozen-time linear models, a gain-scheduled linear–quadratic–integral (LQI) tracking controller is constructed by interpolating local LQI gains and combining them with the equilibrium feedforward term, while explicitly accounting for actuator saturation through anti-windup logic. Numerical studies for a 0.60 m beam discretized by three FE elements demonstrate accurate set-point regulation from s(0) = 0.30 m to multiple targets under a torque limit of ± 4 N m, with well-damped transients and bounded control effort. The resulting framework provides a reproducible workflow for modeling and gain-scheduled optimal tracking control of underactuated flexible structures subject to rolling moving bodies using boundary actuation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sweiti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: