PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

SABIÁ: A Guideline for the installation of AI Data Centers as Critical Infrastructure in Brazil

View Full Paper
CCCaio Leandro Rodrigues CavalcantiUniversidade de FortalezaARAntônio Wendell De Oliveira RodriguesFederal Institute of São PauloPCPaulo Roberto Freire CunhaHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Key Points

  • The aim is to address digital sovereignty in Brazil by proposing guidelines for AI data centers as critical infrastructure.
  • Analyzed the Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan (PBIA) and its conflicts with existing taxation regimes.
  • Proposed guidelines for governance, sustainability, and negotiation strategies for AI data centers in Ceará.
  • Developed a case study accepted by the Government of Ceará for new public AI policy.
  • Highlighted the need for enforceable commitments and governance mechanisms in data center deployment.
  • Demonstrated that tax incentives are insufficient for ensuring technological sovereignty.
  • Presented strategies that turn the arrival of data centers into a driver for socio-economic development.

Abstract

This work examines the pressing issue of digital sovereignty in Brazil, emphasizing the rapid arrival of Artificial Intelligence data centers as a new form of critical infrastructure. It argues that deploying such facilities requires robust governance, sustainability, and transparency mechanisms, as well as enforceable environmental, social, and technological commitments. It further contends that negotiations with investors must be legally structured, socially fair, and guided by verifiable metrics, ensuring concrete benefits for society—especially for communities directly affected. The paper analyzes the Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan (PBIA) and its conceptual conflict with the Special Taxation Regime for Data Center Services (REDATA), showing that tax incentives alone do not ensure technological sovereignty or the capture of strategic value. Two main contributions are highlighted: (i) the book SABIÁ— Brazilian Sovereignty and Autonomy in Artificial Intelligence—as a guideline to accelerate PBIA implementation through an analytical framework based on verifiable metrics (with emphasis on energy, water, and enforceable governance and transparency clauses); and (ii) the proposal AI Data Centers in Ceará: Strategies for Negotiation, Governance, and Sustainable Development, which identifies a favorable geopolitical window and positions the state to negotiate high-impact social, technological, environmental, and economic commitments, turning the arrival of data centers into a strategic driver of development and sovereignty. As a SABIÁ case study, this proposal was accepted by the Government of Ceará and converted into a new public AI policy, designed to initiate a new development cycle in the state and strengthen both the state’s negotiating capacity and digital sovereignty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cavalcanti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23b9f271a5da9775e75af5https://doi.org/10.48545/advance2026-fullpapers-4_3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AI policy debates in Brazil: struggles over regulation, governance and labour2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Limited data and AI framework affects Brazil economy2024
  3. 3Brazil's Renewable Energy Policies And Infrastructure for Green AI Technology Investments: A Comparative Literature Review2025
  4. 4Understanding interrelationships between AI and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in India and Brazil2025
  5. 5Regulation of artificial intelligence in Brazil: examination of Draft Bill no. 2338/20232024 · 3 citations