Shows temporal patterns of landslide susceptibility in high-relief regions, indicating the influence of geomorphic factors.
The Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis in the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau is a tectonically active, deeply incised, high-relief region with frequent landslides. However, the long-term evolution of landslide susceptibility and the temporal behavior of its dominant conditioning factors remain insufficiently understood. This study compiled a 30-year inventory of 1350 landslides from multi-source remote-sensing data and divided it into three periods: P1 (1991–2000), P2 (2001–2010), and P3 (2011–2020). Period-specific random forest models were developed for susceptibility mapping, and Tree-SHAP was used to interpret temporal changes in dominant factors and their nonlinear responses. The models showed reliable performance, with AUC values of 0.887, 0.848, and 0.900, respectively. Susceptibility patterns showed broad temporal stability with localized reorganization, with unchanged areas accounting for 55.62%, 51.62%, and 58.51% of the P1–P2, P2–P3, and P1–P3 transitions, respectively. High and very high susceptibility zones were persistently concentrated along the Yarlung Tsangpo–Parlung Tsangpo–Yigong Tsangpo river system and major tributary junctions. SHAP results identified elevation, slope gradient, terrain curvature, NDVI, and annual precipitation as the persistent core factor group, whereas drainage proximity, the seismic disturbance proxy, and road proximity showed stronger period-dependent effects. Nonlinear SHAP responses revealed threshold-saturation, overall decreasing or distance-decay, threshold-transition, and inverted U-shaped patterns. These findings indicate that susceptibility evolution reflects the coupling between persistent geomorphic predisposition and stage-dependent environmental and disturbance-related modifiers, providing a basis for identifying persistent and stage-specific high-susceptibility zones in high-relief valley regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: