Analysis of forest conversion shows differing impacts on taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of birds and mammals, highlighting the need for tailored conservation strategies.
Forest conversion from natural forests to secondary forests and plantations has significantly altered wildlife habitats in subtropical regions. However, the drivers of disparities in bird and mammal multidimensional diversity between these forest types remain poorly understood. We analyzed a four-year camera-trapping dataset to compare the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and community structure of birds and mammals. Our results indicated that forest conversion impacts biodiversity differently across taxa. Birds exhibited higher taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity in secondary forests than in plantations. A similar pattern was also evident for birds among different stand types. However, mammals exhibited considerable taxonomic diversity but showed higher phylogenetic diversity and structure in secondary forests. A similar pattern was also evident for mammals among different stand types. Beta diversity revealed significant differences in bird taxonomic composition and mammal phylogenetic composition between secondary and plantation forests. Furthermore, elevation primarily influenced bird taxonomic diversity, phylogenetic diversity and structure in secondary forests, whereas mammal functional diversity, phylogenetic diversity and structure were more sensitive to elevational changes in both secondary and plantation forests. These findings reveal that birds and mammals respond distinctively to forest conversion. We emphasize that management strategies must be group-specific. For birds, we recommend prioritizing the preservation of secondary forests as biodiversity refugia and transforming structurally simplified plantations into complex habitats by retaining legacy trees and native understory vegetation. For mammals, conservation should prioritize landscape-scale connectivity by protecting continuous forest corridors along altitudinal gradients. Practically, this requires restricting further fragmentation of high-altitude habitats and restoring native vegetation in degraded corridors to facilitate dispersal and maintain the phylogenetic integrity of mammal communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: