Examines liposomal nano-curcumin's effect on ovarian toxicity in female Wistar rats, suggesting a novel treatment approach.
An emerging but poorly understood risk to female reproductive health is the pervasiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as environmental contaminants, especially the pseudo-persistent medication diclofenac. This study examined the effectiveness of liposomal nano-curcumin (NC), a bioactive nanocarrier with strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant qualities, in treating (therapeutic model) ovarian toxicity in adult female Wistar rats brought on by long-term exposure to an environmental concentration of diclofenac (609.12 μg/L in drinking water). Based on an average water intake of 12.5 mL/100g body weight, this exposure translates to a systemic dose of approximately 76.14 μg/kg/day. Following the cessation of a 100-day exposure period, rats were treated with NC (5 and 20 mg/kg, IP) for 21 days. Thirty animals were divided into six groups (n=5) at random: diclofenac (DIC), NC5 (5 mg/kg), NC20 (20 mg/kg), control, DIC+NC5, and DIC+NC20. In addition to causing significant ovarian damage, such as follicular atresia, stromal hyperplasia, and a decreased healthy/atretic follicle ratio, diclofenac exposure also markedly increased relative ovarian weight. These effects were accompanied by downregulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2. Only a partial histological recovery was obtained with low-dose NC (5 mg/kg). Compared to animals exposed to diclofenac, high-dose NC (20 mg/kg) showed remarkable restorative efficacy, notably increasing primary and developing follicle populations, decreasing atresia, restoring ovarian cytoarchitecture, and significantly upregulating Bcl-2 expression while modulating IL-6 levels. These results offer the first proof that liposomal nano-curcumin, by means of coordinated modulation of follicular survival pathways and inflammatory mediators, represents a promising therapeutic approach for reducing reproductive toxicity caused by environmental pharmaceutical contamination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chafai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: