Cross-sectional study investigates allergic rhinitis prevalence in children under five, suggesting environmental impacts.
Background/Objectives: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is increasingly recognized in early childhood; however, its prevalence and environmental determinants within urban informal settlements remain under-researched. This study investigated the prevalence and risk factors associated with allergic rhinitis among children under five years old attending preschools in Alexandra Township, Johannesburg. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 3265 children. Data were collected through self-reported surveys with caregivers, designed to assess demographic, clinical, and environmental variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and p-values for potential environmental and clinical risk factors. Results: The findings show a prevalence of 37.3% (n = 1214) for allergic rhinitis, 47.3% (n = 1544) for rhinitis, and 42.7% (n = 1394) for rhinoconjunctivitis. Exposure to open sewerage pipelines was associated with the highest risk (AOR: 4.85, p < 0.001), followed by prolonged residence in the township (greater than 24 months; AOR: 2.74, p < 0.001) and proximity to local waterways (AOR: 1.89, p < 0.001). Additional significant factors included frequent paracetamol consumption and walking to school, while asthma and eczema exhibited an association with the presence of AR. Conclusions: The elevated prevalence of allergic symptoms within this cohort is linked to localized macro-environmental hazards, suggesting that infrastructural challenges in informal urban settings may influence early respiratory health outcomes. Protecting pediatric respiratory health may necessitate multisectoral interventions, with a specific emphasis on ensuring safe sanitation and clean household energy, to complement traditional clinical management in these vulnerable communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: