Examines lower-limb performance enhancement protocol’s impact on swimming performance, suggesting individualized approaches maximize benefits.
Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) has been proposed as an acute strategy to improve explosive performance, yet its effects on sprint-swimming performance remain unclear, particularly when individualized recovery timing is considered. This study examined the acute effects of a lower-limb PAPE protocol, applied using an individually determined recovery time (IRT), on 50 m front crawl performance and selected start-, race-, and turn-related kinematic variables in national-level male swimmers. Fourteen male national-level swimmers completed a randomized repeated-measures cross-over design comprising control (CON) and PAPE conditions. In the PAPE condition, swimmers performed a lower-limb conditioning protocol consisting of loaded lunge-position squats on a Keiser Squat machine, followed by a maximal 50 m front crawl trial at the end of the IRT. In the CON condition, swimmers completed the same swimming trial without the conditioning stimulus. Lower-limb power output increased significantly after the conditioning activity and reached its highest mean value at 6 min post-exercise ( F 4,52 = 97.14, p < 0.001). However, the PAPE protocol did not significantly improve overall 50 m performance (25.508 ± 0.856 s vs. 25.529 ± 0.773 s; mean difference = − 0.021 s, 95% CI: −0.148 to 0.107; p = 0.731) or most start-related variables. The only significant effect was observed for turn time, which was lower in the PAPE condition than in CON (7.707 ± 0.251 s vs. 7.771 ± 0.261 s; mean difference = − 0.064 s, 95% CI: −0.126 to − 0.001; p = 0.046). Responder analysis revealed substantial inter-individual variability across outcomes. In conclusion, a lower-limb PAPE protocol applied using the IRT did not improve overall 50 m front crawl performance in national-level male swimmers, although it produced a small improvement in turn time. These findings suggest that the effects of lower-limb PAPE in sprint swimming may be segment-specific rather than global, and that practical implementation should be individualized rather than applied uniformly across swimmers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanula et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: